What is the key difference – WD SSD Green vs Blue? Do they support gaming? There is a noticable performance difference between the two drives however. The Green series should only be used for basic computing. Not only will one be limited by the performance of the Green drive, but they are also risking their data.
It is recommended that even users who only intend on using the computer for basic tasks purchase a Blue drive due to the greater reliability and performance. This is especially apparent with the very small price difference. Get details in WD SSD Green vs Blue comparison.
Compare WD SSD Green vs Blue
| Specification Compared | WD Blue SSD | WD Green SSD |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity Range | 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | 120GB, 240GB, 480GB, 1TB, 2TB |
| Sequential Read Speed | 545 MB/s | 545 MB/s |
| Form Factor | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Interface Speed | 6 Gb/s | 6 Gb/s |
| Warranty Period | 3 years | 3 years |
| Operating Temp | 0 to 70 Celsius | 0 to 70 Celsius |
| Reliability (in hours) | Up to 1.75 Million hours | Up to 1.0 Million hours |
If one looks closely, they will notice there is a major difference in reliability. Some may question why this is important.
The reliability rating determines how long the drive will last. The WD Blue Solid State Drive is rated to last 75% longer than the Green SSD.
Think of it as the drive quality. With such a little price difference, would you prefer to purchase a drive with nearly half the rated lifespan of the other? When it comes to hard drives, it is best to keep your data secure. After all, drive failures typically occur without notice.
If you do not intend on storing important data on your new drive, then perhaps the few dollars saved are worth it. In the long run, most would rather spend the few extra dollars for a better quality drive.
Detailed WD SSD Green vs Blue review
WD Green
As the vast majority of the ongoing section SSDs, the WD Green uses TLC (triple level cell) recollections. This sort of memory stores not two, as on most MLC memory chips, however three bits. It permits a higher information thickness and, in this manner, a littler assembling cost for an equivalent limit chip.
This worth is generally high and won’t be an issue for common home use, yet it makes these models ill advised for applications that need a major measure of information composing, similar to servers, for instance.
The fundamental issue with TLC memory chips, contrasted with the worthless MLC chips (and significantly more contrasted with the SLC memory chip, that store just one piece for each phone) is the littler life expectancy, on the grounds that there is more cell wearing on the eradicating procedure (executed before composing new information), which reflects in a littler TBW (Total Bytes Written, which means the measure of information that can be kept in touch with the drive before it can have issues).
Every one of them use SATA-600 interface and the 2.5″ structure factor, with 7 mm tallness. All the tried drives have 256 GiB all out memory, however they are sold as 240 GiB since 16 GiB are held for “overprovisioning”.
This builds crude speed past what is conceivable even on a portion of the WD Black drives. Higher information thickness likewise diminishes cost, as a solitary 1TB platter has a less expensive BOM than numerous platters.
WD’s latest Blue HDDs utilize a solitary 1TB platter, which takes into account higher speeds because of its higher information thickness. Because of the thickness of the circle, the movement necessity on the header is limited (more information in a square inch, so less development is required) and look for times are decreased.
The Blue drives transport at a most extreme limit of 1TB (1 platter, except if it’s a more established model) and are constantly 7200RPM. In the occasion a SSD is absent, we for the most part energize 7200RPM HDDs as the pattern for essential and gaming drive use.
Store for a WD Blue HDD will in general be 64MB, which is all that could possibly be needed for higher-speed blasted activities; purchaser HDDs will by and large never (or in all respects infrequently) use >64MB reserve.
• The guarantee sits at 2 years, not exactly 50% of the WD Black’s 5-year guarantee.
• WD Blue’s essential focal points are:
• Higher paces – 7200RPM makes it perfect for essential drive and gaming use.
• Most elevated thickness – best cost-to-execution proportion and speed, even over WD Black.
• Moderately peaceful for the speed.
WD Blue’s impediments are:
• Max 1TB limit.
• 2-Year guarantee.
WD Blue
Western Digital’s standard customer drives have for quite some time been branded as WD Blue drives, and this continued to SSDs after their securing of SanDisk.
The initial two ages of WD Blue SSDs were SATA drives utilizing TLC NAND and were commendable contenders for the Crucial MX arrangement and Samsung 850 EVO.
Western Digital has been selling customer NVMe drives for a couple of years utilizing their top of the line WD Black branding, however NVMe isn’t only for fan items any more.
The WD Blue SN500 is the third era WD Blue SSD, and it moves the WD Blue brand over to an altogether different market section: the SN500 is a passage level M.2 NVMe drive.
This passage level NVMe specialty has now and again been pressed down to nothing when there are especially well-estimated top of the line drives, however the general thought of parting the customer NVMe SSD showcase into two levels isn’t leaving.
For as long as year we’ve been seeing most SSD brands offering a lower level of NVMe items that sit between their SATA and top of the line NVMe contributions, both as far as cost and execution.
SATA is beginning to be eliminated of utilization for essential stockpiling in customer PCs. Western Digital began supporting that pattern once again a year prior with the PC SN520 SSD for OEMs, which the WD Blue SN500 is gotten from.
Western Digital structured this design to scale over a wide scope of items, so the chop down arrangement we find on the SN500 was a piece of the arrangement from the beginning.
These are the original of in-house NVMe controller structures from Western Digital, yet dependent on our involvement with the WD Blacks it doesn’t feel like a 1.0 item: they skirted every one of the failure that Silicon Motion and Phison had with their first NVMe controllers, and rather the WD Black went head to head with Samsung’s NVMe SSDs.
The WD Blue SN500 might be somewhat low-end by NVMe standards, yet its exhibition particulars are still far above what SATA SSDs can give. The SN500’s compose continuance rating of 0.3 DWPD over a 5-year guarantee is standard for standard and some top of the line SSDs.
The WD Blue SN500 won’t set any exhibition precedents with only a PCIe x2 interface, yet it has the chance to proceed with the amazing reputation on power productivity that Western Digital has been building.
There are different DRAMless NVMe SSDs and some QLC-put together NVMe SSDs with respect to the market that are less expensive than the WD Blue SN500, so the new WD Blue needs to accomplish something other than beat SATA so as to be focused.
The present retail estimating is around 10-15% higher than the great arrangements on standard SATA SSDs of practically identical limit, so Western Digital is just charging a little premium for conveying NVMe execution.
Alternate
WD BLACK D10
SPECIFICATIONS
Capacity: 8TBDrive: HDDConnector: USBPortable: No
REASONS TO BUY
+Eye-catching, rugged design+Lots of space+Speedy and quiet in operation
REASONS TO AVOID
-Not particularly cheap-Needs its own power supply
If you’re happy to leave your drive powered up on the desktop and don’t need it to be portable, then the Western Digital Black D10 has the performance and the looks that you need. There’s only one storage option – 8TB – but that should be enough for you, whether you’re using this with a computer or a video games console.
And that wide compatibility is only part of the story here. It’s speedy and quiet even under pressure, it’s designed to be placed either horizontally or vertically, and you can even charge your other gadgets off it. If you’re looking for one of the best external hard drives for a desktop setup, then you can’t do much better than this.
