Which is better to invest – Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T? Sony X800H and Samsung Q60T are the mid-end LED TVs in 2020 from each of their manufacturer. Each of them has advantages and drawbacks to every other. within the market they both are available tons of screen sizes option. For the Q60T, it’s available on 7 screen sizes option including 43 inches (QN43Q60T), 50 inches (QN60Q60T), 55 inches (QN55Q60T), 58 inches (QN58Q60T), 65 inches (QN65Q60T), 75 inches (QN75Q60T), and 85 inches (QN85Q60T). On the opposite hand, for the X800H, it lacks 58 inches model and comes in 49 inches instead 50 inches. From the littlest , the X800H is out there on 43 inches (XNR43X800H), 49 inches (XNR49X800H), 55 inches (XNR55X800H), 65 inches (XNR65X800H), 75 inches (XNR75X800H), and 85 inches (XNR85X800H).
Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T comparison
Meanwhile, with an equivalent screen sizes (XBR43X800H vs QN43Q60T, XBR49X800H vs QN50Q60T, XBR55X800H vs QN55Q60T, XBR65X800H vs QN65Q60T, XBR75X800H vs QN75Q60T, and XBR85X800H vs QN85Q60T), their price are counting on the screen size. In certain size, their price is nearly similar, but in other certain screen size, the Q60T or X800H is costlier . So, what features and performance are offered by each and which may be a more sensible choice between them?
Panel Technology
Just like other models of Samsung TV, the Samsung Q60T also uses VA panel technology. and that we have known, a TV with VA panel usually has good native contrast ratio. However, it’s poor side viewing angle. On the opposite hand, except its 75 inches and 85 inches models that also use VA panel, the Sony X800H uses IPS panel. the other of the VA panel, a TV with IPS panel usually has good side viewing angle but otherwise, it’s poor side viewing angle. Considering the X800H use different panel technology surely scenes, this comparison refers to their model that use IPS panel. Meanwhile, as their backlight technology, the Samsung Q60T uses direct LED while the X800H depends on the screen sizes. For its 43 inches and 49 inches model, it uses Edge Lit Led while for its 55 inches model and larger , it uses VA panel technology. But unfortunately, they both don’t have any local dimming technology which will improve their performance during a dark room.
Image Processor
As their processors, the Samsung Q60T is powered by Quantum 4K Processor 4K Lite. Although this processor lacks some features found on the upper series like Q70T or higher but it’s powerful in mastering HDR content, optimizing native contrast ratio, and orchestrating color. On the opposite hand, the Sony X800H is powered by 4K HDR Processor X1, rock bottom model of X1 Engine family. a bit like on Q60T, this processor also lacks some features found the X1 Extreme or X1 Ultimate engine. Although not as powerful because the higher model, but this processor is additionally fairly powerful to process HDR images, optimize contrast and orchestrate color.
Motion Technology
For maximizing their performance in processing fast paced image, the Samsung Q60T is powered by Motion Rate 120 Technology while the Sony X800H is powered by MotionFlow XR240. But basically, both of those technologies are supported native 60 Hz refresh rate panel. Since they both only support 60 Hz refresh panel, this certainly makes them don’t support native 120fps content and HFR (High Frame Rate Content). Additionally, they both also don’t support any VRR Variable Refresh Rate) technology which will improve their game experience.
Meanwhile, to dim their backlight, they use different system. For the Q60T, it uses PWM (Pulse Width Dimming) system with dimming frequency of 600 Hz in most picture mode. Since it uses high frequency, this certainly makes its backlight flicker isn’t noticeable for many people. But however , its dimming frequency can change counting on the image setting. If the image mode is about to “Game”, “Standard”, “Dynamic”, and “Natural”, its dimming frequency will change to 120 Hz. Additionally, enabling the “Picture Clarity” also will make its dimming frequency is usually 120 Hz. you’ll also change its dimming frequency to 60 Hz by enabling its BFI mode by turning on “LED Clear Motion”. during this setting, this may make motion looks smoother, but on the hand, this may make its backlight flicker could be noticeable for a few people, especially for people that sensitive to flicker.
On the opposite hand, the Sony X800H doesn’t use PWM dimming system. This makes its screen is nearly flicker-free. But however , to form motion smoother, the X800H also has an optional BFI (Black Frame Insertion) mode. But unfortunately, its lowest possible frequency of its BFI mode is 120 Hz, not 60 Hz. this might be ready to make motion smoother, but when it’s playing 60 fps content, this might make some duplication.
Inputs
As their major connectivity, Sony X800H has 4 HDMI ports while the Samsung Q60T has 3 HDMI ports only. All of their HDMI ports support HDMI 2.0, HDCP 2.2, and CEC. Additionally, one among their HDMI port also support ARC (Audio Return Channel), HDMI 2 for Q60T and HDMI 3 for X800H. Their HDMI ports also support most resolution of 60 fps content including 1080p, 4K, 4K with HDR, and 4K @4:4:4 chroma. The advantage of Q60T is that it also supports 1440p while the X800H doesn’t support. albeit they both support HDR content, but the format supported by them is different, particularly for dynamic HDR content. They both support HDR10 and HLG, except for dynamic HDR, the X800H supports Dolby Vision while the Q60T supports HDR10+.
IN addition to HDMI ports, they both even have 2 USB ports. except for this case, the USB ports of the X800H are USB 3.0 while the USB ports of the Q60T are USB 2.0. Additionally, they both even have 1 Composite In, 1 RF In, 1 Digital Audio Out (optical), and 1 Ethernet ports. They both even have built-in Wi-Fi for wireless connection. Special for the X800H, it also has analog audio out (Mini Jack 3.5 mm) and IR In (IR Blaster) while the Q60T doesn’t have this port.
Smart TV Platform -Tizen 2020 vs Android 8.0
As their smart TV platform, the Sony X800H runs Android TV 9.0 Pie while the Samsung Q60T runs Tizen 2020 with reduced some features. Both of those smart TV platforms have attractive and intuitive interface but in fact with different design. Their interface is equally smooth and straightforward to use. But however , as compared , the interface of the Q60T is simpler while the X800H is smoother. Talking about apps provide, they both also provided tons of pre-installed apps like VoD Service, browser , Games, Live TV, etc. They both even have apps store which have great selections of apps, Tizen OS with Samsung Apps Store and Android TVs with Google Play Store. They both also already support Home Smart Apps like Amazon Alexa, Google Home, etc. Their smart TV platform also already supports Voice Navigation. Samsung Q60T is supported by Samsung’s Bixby while the Q60R is supported by Google Voice Assistant.
Remote – Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T
As their major controller, the Samsung Q60T is provided with Samsung Smart Controller TM2020A while the Sony X800H is provided with Sony Voice Remote. The Samsung Remote is little and only features a few buttons while the Sony Remote is large and features a lot of buttons. Nevertheless, their remotes both are equipped with inbuilt microphone and have many features of voice control. Their voice command will only work once they are paired to the TV via Bluetooth. Both of those remote also can be wont to control other devices that support HDMI CEC. And with Ambient OneRemote feature on the Remote of Q60T and IR Blaster on the Remote of the X800H, their remote also can be wont to control other devices via IR. This certainly is extremely helpful to regulate other devices that don’t support CEC. But as we’ve known, the control via IR need direct line of sight to the devices.
Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T performance review
Contrast and Black Level
As we’ve discussed above, the utilization of the VA panel make the Samsung Q60T has excellent native contrast ratio. With around 7000:1 of contrast ratio, the Q60T can produce very deep black. And combined to its excellent black uniformity, makes black of images appear excellently on its screen, albeit it’s set during a dark room. Additionally, deep black produced by the Q60T is additionally deep enough to point out shadow details of HDR images excellently the way they ought to in HDR. On the opposite hand, the native contrast ratio of the Sony X800H is extremely poor. With around 1000:1, the deepest black produced by the X800H is merely around 0.1 nits. This certainly is deep enough to point out inky black. Additionally, its black level isn’t also dark enough to point out shadow details of HDR image they ought to be. during a dark room, rather than really black, black of images even looks tend to gray than really black. But however , once it’s set during a bright room where the impact of native contrast ratio isn’t too sensitive, the image displayed on the screen of the X800H will look far better .
Winner: Q60T
Peak Brightness
Both Samsung Q60T and Sony X800H have good SDR peak brightness. albeit the X800H actually features a bit brighter peak brightness than the Q60T, but their difference isn’t too significant. With around 400-450 nits, their peak brightness is bright enough to fight the glare in most bright room. The upside, their peak brightness is comparatively consistent in most windows sizes. this suggests , they both can show differing types of content with an equivalent luminosity , which is great. Special for the Q60T, its peak brightness in 2% window (2% of screen is white while the remainder is black) is darker than the remainder , which is around 250 nits. this suggests , small highlight will looks dimmer on the screen of the Q60T. But however , overall, their SDR pea brightness is equally good.
Meanwhile, with HDR contents, the height brightness of the Samsung Q60T is comparatively same. For SDR content, peak brightness of the Q60T could be bright enough to fight the glare, but it’s not bright enough to point out HDR images they ought to be. And a bit like with SDR content, its peak brightness in 2% window is darker that creates small highlight cannot pop the way they ought to in HDR. On the opposite hand, with HDR content, the Sony X800H can hit brighter peak brightness than with HDR content. And a bit like with SDR content, their peak brightness is comparatively consistent at any window sizes. With around 500 nits, HDR images displayed on their screen actually is fairly bright. But however , its peak brightness isn’t still bright enough to form HDR images standout like content creator intended. Additionally, its peak brightness in small window is additionally not bright enough to form small highlight pop. But however , with all of their shortcomings, for his or her price range, their HDR peak brightness remains good.
Winner: X800H
Color Performance – Wide color gamut
The Sony X800H and Samsung Q60T have good color gamut and their color gamut is additionally almost similar. In DCI P3 uv, the X800H can cover around 93% of color space while the Q60T can cover around 92% of color space. Meanwhile, in Rec.2020uv, the Q60T and X800H can cover around 72%. this suggests , their color gamut is wide enough to point out HDR images colorfully the way they ought to in HDR. While they both have almost similar color gamut, the Q60T has better color volume than the X800H. The advantage of the Q60T is that it can produce deep dark colors. On the opposite hand, since the X800H has low native contrast ratio, it cannot produce deep dark color fairly well. But however , except dark colors, they both can well show their wide color gamut at entire their brightness well. However, as is typical of LED TVs, they both cannot also produce very bright blues.
Meanwhile, in term of color gradient, the Sony X800H has much smoother color gradient than the Samsung Q60T. On the screen of the Q60T, there’s banding in most colors. it’s going to have “Noise Reduction” feature which will be wont to remove banding. But set this feature to “Auto” can only helps a touch and can’t remove the banding completely. On the opposite hand, color gradient of HDR images displayed on the screen of the X800H looks much smoother. In certain reminder colors like dark green or red , there could also be still some banding. However, this could be hard to note for many people.
Winner: X800H
Side Viewing Angle – Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T
Just we’ve discussed above, the utilization of VA panel may make the Q60T has good native contras ratio, but on the opposite hand, this makes its side viewing angle coverage is poor. On the opposite hand, the utilization of IPS panel makes the X800H low native contrast ratio, but on the opposite hand, it’s good side viewing angle. On the screen of the Q^0T, black level will degrade started at around 15 degrees off center and front and is worse because the angle is increase. On the opposite hand, the X800H is in a position to take care of its black level up to extremely wide angle. Additionally, if the Q60T can only maintain its brightness at around 32 degrees, the X800H can maintain its peak brightness up to around 45 degrees. Meanwhile, in maintain color accuracy, the X800H is additionally far better than the Q60T. If on the screen of the Q60T, the colour will start to lose its accuracy at around 25 degrees, on the screen of the X800H, the colour accuracy are often maintained up to around 45 degrees.
Winner: X800H
Motion Handling
The Sony X800H also has faster pixel reaction time than the Samsung Q60T. If the pixel reaction time of the X800H is around 15 ms, the Q60T is around 18 ms. But however , considering their value, their difference isn’t too significant. Separated from their difference, their pixel reaction time is equally good. fast paced scenes look very smooth on their screen. Although there’s actually a brief ghosting trail following fast paced object, this could not be noticeable to most of the people .
Meanwhile, as we’ve discussed above, to assist make motion smoother, they both even have an optional BFI (Black Frame Insertion) mode. But the Q60T is best due its lowest possible frequency of flickering pattern is 60 Hz while the X800H is 120 Hz. Since the X800H have 60 Hz native refresh rate, with 120 Hz flickering, this may cause some duplication which will bother some people. But confine mind, enabling their BFI mode may make motion is smoother, but on the opposite hand, this may makes their backlight flicker is more noticeable.
In processing 24p movies, the Sony X800H may be a bit better than the Q60T. Regardless, the source, the Samsung Q60T cannot remove the judder, albeit the source is native 24p content like DVD or Blu Ray movies. On the opposite hand, although the X800H cannot also remove the judder in 24p content via 60p signal like movies from satellite television , via 60p signal like movies from streaming devices, or movies from native apps like Netflix, YouTube, etc, but a minimum of , it can still remove the judder from native 24p source. Fortunately, most of the people don’t sensitive to judder, so this could not be a significant problem for them.
Winner: X800H
Input Lags – Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T
Both Sony X800H and Samsung Q60T have excellent input lags in Game Mode. And their input lags are almost an equivalent in most resolution which supported by them. Except in 4K with 10 Bit HDR, their input lags are around 10 ms, which is superb . But on 4K resolution with 10 bit HDR, the input lags of the Q60T is above the X800H. If the input lag of the X800H is around 13 ms, the input lag of the Q60T is around 28 ms. On the contrary, in 4K with interpolation, the input lag of the Q60T is far faster than the X800H where input lag of the Q60T is around 26 ms while X800H is around 128 ms. But however , separated from their difference, generally , their input lags are low enough to form them very responsive for any games, even for fast games that need fast reflexes.
